FitzCaliston
User
| Posts: 169 |   |
|
Gambeson=padded/quilted armor? - 2006/07/31 20:13
Does a Gambeson become “padded/quilted armor” in areas not covered by chain, ie worth 1 pt?
Padded armor can be studded/ringed (though I personally wish this allowance were to go away) while Gambesons cannot.
Can 1 piece be both? ( I know it's played this way in most places but not sure it's supported by the rulebook).
Situation: 1-So a player has a full padded armor that covers full torso, full arms, and full legs (in skirt form).
2-He throws a set of 3pt Chain over it that covers full torso, upper arms (to about mid point on the bicep), and the butt/groin/upper thigh area.
3-He adds a set of 6pt bracers to his forearms that cover up to about 1 inch from his inner elbow.
A-Now to average his arms:
Upper arm=4pts (3pt chain + 1pt gambeson bonus) Middle Arm=1pt (padded/quilted armor) or 0 points Gambeson Lower arm=6pts
Total Arm Average= 3pt (using padded armor) Or Upper and lower arm=5pt (with a large “hole” in the middle section)
B-Now if a Gambeson in a non-chain maille’d area is considered “padded armor” and we then stud the Middle Arm area the average goes as so:
Upper arm=4pts (3pt chain + 1pt gambeson bonus) Middle Arm=2pt (1pt padded/quilted armor + 1pt) Lower arm=6pts
Total Arm Average=4pts
I know the best option is for him to extend the sleeves down to the top of the bracers but the question still applies to his legs. Does he consider the whole skirt padded (thus removing the Gambeson effect on the butt and groin, and consequently making the torso armor as a whole drop 1 point due to averaging sections), a Gambeson (zero armor) or both?
And yes I know that most places will consider it both, just not sure that can be supported by the rules as written.
Post edited by: FitzCaliston, at: 2006/07/31 20:22
|